If you want to find out more about when to expect a decision from the Editor, click here. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. 85,307,200 Downloads (in 2021) Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. . Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit After peer review, a decision of accept, reject, or revision is made on the basis of the reviewers comments and the judgment of the editor. For most of our journals the corresponding author can track the article online. 0000012316 00000 n hoi4 what to do when capitulate. 0000011085 00000 n The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.03, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. Helmer M, Schottdorf M, Neef A, Battaglia D. Research: gender bias in scholarly peer review. Decisions are to be made by consensus. A test for equality of proportions for groups 1 and 2 for SBPR papers returned a significant difference (2=331.62, df=1, p value <0.001); the same test for group 2 and group 3 for SBPR papers also returned a significant difference (2=464.86, df=1, p value <0.001). The dataset consisted of 133,465 unique records, with 63,552 different corresponding authors and 209,057 different institution names. Google Scholar. We identify two potential causes for this, one being a difference in quality and the other being a gender bias. The Editors may take time to discuss the reviews and may invite more reviewers or assign another editor, returning the submission to an earlier status. We aimed at modelling acceptance based on the following variables (and all their subsets): review type (SB/DB), corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). . Often commercial sensors do not provide researchers with sufficient raw and open data; therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an open and customizable system to classify cattle behaviors. Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts . The results of a Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=378.17, degrees of freedom=2, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.054 and show that authors submitting to more prestigious journals tend to have a slight preference for DBPR compared to SBPR. A test for equality of proportions for groups 1 and 2 for DBPR papers showed a non-significant result (2=0.13012, df=1, p value=0.7183), and the same test on group 2 and group 3 for DBPR papers showed a significant result (2=40.898, df=1, p value <0.001). Research Integrity and Peer Review 9. The difference, however, is very small. In order to see whether author uptake could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. volume3, Articlenumber:5 (2018) The underlying research question that drove this study is to assess whether DBPR is effective in removing or reducing implicit reviewer bias in peer review. 1 Answer to this question. If we compare the proportion of accepted manuscripts under DBPR and authored by female vs. male corresponding authors (26 vs. 25%) with a test for equality of proportions with continuity correction, we find that there is a not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for DBPR-accepted papers (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction: 2=0.03188, df=1, p value=0.8583). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. For the sake of completeness, Table8 includes the number and percentages of rejected vs. out-to-review manuscripts for which the gender of the corresponding author was male, female, or NA. Your script could be better than the image of the journal. 7u?p#T3;JUQJBw|u 2v{}ru76SRA? Over the past years, several studies have analysed the efficacy of DBPR in eradicating implicit bias in specific scientific disciplines. Mayo Clin Proc. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Springer Nature. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. This is because authors cannot modify their choice of review model at the transfer stage, and thus transfers cannot contribute to the uptake analysis. Concerning the institutions, we defined four categories according to their THE ranks and used these as a proxy for prestige: category 1 includes institutions with THE rank between 1 and 10 (corresponding to 7167 manuscripts, 6% of all manuscripts), category 2 is for THE ranks between 11 and 100 (25,345 manuscripts, 20% of all manuscripts), category 3 for THE ranks above 100 (38,772 manuscripts, 30% of all manuscripts), and category 4 for non-ranked institutions (57,170 manuscripts, or 45% of all manuscripts). Our main question concerns a possible gender bias; therefore, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and gender, still including both direct submissions and transfers (Table8). On this page you will find a suite of citation-based metrics for Nature Communications which provides an overview of this journal. Nevertheless, the available data allowed us to draw conclusions on the uptake of the review models, as we detail below. On this page you will find a suite of citation-based metrics for Nature Communications which provides an overview of this journal. As such, the decision to publish an article rests entirely with the handling Editor. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Nature 's editors are. This may be due to the higher quality of the papers from more prestigious institutions or to an editor bias towards institutional prestige, or both. 2002;179(6):14157. There is a tiny but significant association between institution group and acceptance, which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. The decision post-review of whether to accept a paper or not is taken by the editor but is based on the feedback received from the referees, so we assume that the decision at this stage would reflect a potential referee bias. Cohen-Friendly association plot for Table5. Online First - Article available online 6. our vision is for all Springer Nature authors and reviewers to have an ORCID iD, and we are confident we will get there, slowly but surely. bounded rationality . While these shortcomings of the data are beyond our control, we have made it clear in the Results section when and why we have excluded a subset of the dataset in each aspect of the analysis. This first-of-its-kindoption, called In Review, brought to you by our partners at Research Square, makes it easy to share a preprint of your manuscript on the Research Square platform andgives you real time updates onyour manuscripts progress through peer review. Rejection of your paper / manuscript : Nature Support Press J to jump to the feed. It was on December 21, 1968, that Apollo 8 launched from Cape Kennedy, in Florida, sending US astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell Jr and William Anders on the world's . 2022.6.13 Editor Decision Started. The test yielded a non-significant p value (2=5.2848, df=2, p value=0.07119). We calculated that, at this rate, it would take us several decades to collect sufficient data that would result in statistically significant results, so another strategy is required, e.g. Modified on: Thu, 30 Jul, 2020 at 4:54 PM. Submissions not complying with policy and guidelines receive an immediate (administrative) reject and are not forwarded to the review process (IEEE PSPB Operation Manual, 8.2.2.3) Authors are required to ensure before submission that their manuscripts are in full compliance with the magazine's submission policy and guidelines as outlined below. 2000;90(4):71541. Finally, we associated each author with a gender label (male/female) by using the Gender API service [21]. botln botkyrka kommun. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. The result was a p value below 0.05, which shows that removing any of the predictors would harm the fit of the best model. However, we did not achieve a good fit, as per the binned plot of residuals against expected values, and the C-index (used to assess the discriminatory ability of standard logistic models) is 0.68, so well below the threshold of 0.8 for good fit. EDR was the major contributor in writing the Discussion and Conclusions sections. 1991;81(5):104167. Brown RJC. In the post-review analysis, we found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . HUM6WEX:hQR{pe"3>g7`,. Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. England Women's Football Captain, However, we recommend you check the Junk/ Spam folder in your mailbox to see if the journal's decision letter is present. Am Econ Rev. Decision-making: Theory and practic e 145. how to pronounce dandelion witcher. 0000001568 00000 n nature~. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. 0000001245 00000 n (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Eigenfactor Score calculation is based on the number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year, but it also considers which journals have contributed these citations so that highly cited journals will influence the network more than lesser cited journals. Papers. &@ 5A9BC|2 @So0 We inspected the gender assigned via the Gender API, which assigns an accuracy score between 0 and 100 to each record. I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for You can useIn Reviewto access up-to-date information on where your article is in the peer review process. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. In order to assign a measure of institutional prestige to each manuscript, we used the 2016/2017 Times Higher Education rankings (THE [20]) and normalised the institution names using the GRID API. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The median number of citations received in 2019 for articles published in2017 and 2018. Corrected proofs returned by author 5. Based on the Nature Photonics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.4 days to get the first editorial decision. The dataset contains both direct submissions and transfers, i.e. [No author listed] Nature journals offer double-blind review. . GRID - Global Research Identifier Database. 0000047727 00000 n 25th Apr, 2017. If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. All papers submitted from January 2016 qualify for this scheme. Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. We then mapped the normalised institution names from our dataset to the normalised institution names of the THE rankings via a Python script. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. To post social content, you must have a display name. Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. Nature 2015;518(7539):274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/518274b. Table11 displays the accept rate by review type defined as the number of accepted papers over the total number of accepted or rejected papers. From inspection of Table8, it would seem that SBPR manuscripts by female corresponding authors are more likely to be rejected at the first editorial decision stage than those by male corresponding authors and that DBPR manuscripts by male corresponding authors are less likely to be sent to review than those by female corresponding authors. nature physics. A study of the distribution of gender among reviewers and editors of the Frontiers journals showed an underrepresentation of women in the process, as well as a same-gender preference (homophily) [10]. We found that manuscripts submitted under DBPR are less likely to be sent to review and accepted than those submitted under SBPR. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114. All authors are encouraged to update their demographic and expertise information during the confirmation step. Time: 2023-03-04T15:53:14+00:00. Bruce R, Chauvin A, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, Boutron I. More information regarding the release of these data can be found here. Authors must sign into CTS with the email address to which the link was sent. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. Manuscript Nature switched from ''Review completed'' to - Reddit Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. At Nature Biomedical Engineering, we collect some numbers into a 'journal dashboard': These numbers are running statistics over 6-month intervals (to smooth out fluctuations in the numbers*). 2017-07-13 11:21. Are there differences related to gender or institution within the same review model? Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 2.2 The model of bounded rationality. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and Based on the Nature Communications Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.6 days to get the first editorial decision. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. We found that a smaller proportion of DBPR papers are sent to review compared with SBPR papers and that there is a very small but significant association between review type and outcome of the first editorial decision (results of a chi-square test: 2=1623.3, df=1, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.112). Table3 shows the distribution of DBPR and SBPR in the three gender categories. The results on author uptake show that DBPR is chosen more frequently by authors that submit to higher impact journals within the portfolio, by authors from certain countries, and by authors from less prestigious institutions. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Article Influence Score determines the average influence of a journal's articles over the first five years after publication. Thank you for visiting nature.com. While the metrics presented here are not intended to be a definitive list, we hope that they will prove to be informative. Check Status". As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. The Alan Turing Institute, London, England, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Springer Nature, 4 Crinan Street, London, UK, You can also search for this author in Scand J Econ. We aimed at modelling uptake (baseline SB) based on the following variables (and all their subsets): corresponding authors gender, the group of their institution (1, 2, 3, or 4), the category of their country (Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, South Korea, the UK, the USA, and Others), and the journal tier (Nature, Nature sister journals, and Nature Communications). . Submission to Accept: the median time (in days) from the published submission date to the final editorial acceptance date. The area of each rectangle is proportional to the difference between observed and expected frequencies, where the dotted lines refer to expected frequencies.
